andallthat.co.uk Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the andallthat.co.uk

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host andallthat.co.uk. Currently, hosted in United States and its service provider is Weebly Inc. .

the related websites

practiceplan.co.uk bestival.net fredperry.com banksy.co.uk fantasy.premierleague.com tesco.net apple.com telegraph.co.uk hostelbookers.com charlottetilbury.com ticketweb.co.uk 

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called Apache containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

gcse / a level topics america 1789-1900 antisemitism british radicalism 1789-1900 crusades elizabeth i germany 1919-45 historical interpretations historic environment international relations 1900-2000 italian renaissance medicine medieval kings russia 1855-1921 soviet russia politics files ks3 topics interpretations stand-alone lessons new ks3 file store old ks3 file store student resources advice gcse options a level options personal studies university applications > choosing courses general advice personal statements predicted grades teachers yhep teach meet stand-alone lessons > ancient world medieval world early modern industrial revolution modern world post-modern world ks3 teaching resources meetthehistorians trips about sub contact your gcse history results questions answered: five things i learned from your surveys 8/29/2018 0 comments hello everyone and thanks if you have filled in my history gcse 2018 survey. if you are interested in insights from this kind of survey, it would be great if you could also take a moment to fill in the historical association annual survey . this helps the ha act as a voice for the profession more effectively. you can fill it in here . in my last i used overview data to compare the gcse results this year to last year, as well as looking at the grade boundaries for different boards. the survey data collected allows me to look more specifically at the results of departments. so for example, big data suggested that the proportion of grades was essentially similar to last year, but it was impossible to tell if this was because departments did the same, or because some did brilliantly and others appallingly. in this i am going to try to pull out some answers to key questions i am hearing a lot on twitter and facebook. please note that this data is only a sample of 363 schools, all of whom engage actively with social media, so the data is mostly suggesting things rather than proving anything. however, i did manage to get a broadly representative sample in terms of the distribution of data around the 65% 9-4 average. for more on the data set please see the end of the . if you'd like a fully anonymised copy for your very own, please do let me know. as each post is quite long i have indexed the questions here: 1. were results more or less stable in 2018 compared to 2017 - read on further 2. did teaching a 2 or 3 year curriculum have the biggest impact on 2018 results? 3. what impact did exam question practise have on results? 4. was the a*-a / 9-7 rate affected? 5. what impact did non-specialist teaching have on grade stability? conclusions in lost of ways i am glad i cannot draw many clear conclusions from this data. the slight differences between results from 2017 to 2018 suggest that departments have not been unduly hit by these changes and these is a broad level of fairness in how they have occurred. while some departments clearly will not be pleased with their results (and others by turn delighted), this is not unusual in the picture of gcse. the only slight impact here may be that departments who have been historically stable, are now in a category of less stable schools. however, to assess this, i would need data going back further, and probably in more depth. what i do now have is a large bank of data on the 2018 exams, so if anyone has a question they’d like me to investigate using the dataset i have, please do get in touch. note: for almost all of these explorations i have compared results in terms of stability. so for example 2018 stability is calculated by comparing a school’s results in 2018 with their results in 2017. if the results are in the same bracket, then i would consider them broadly stable. if their results this year were a bracket or more above last year e.g. last year they got 50-59% a*c and this year 60-69% 9-4, then they are consider as doing better, and the reverse if they are lower this year. 1. were results more or less stable in 2018 compared to 2017? read more 0 comments new history gcses: five important things we learned on results day 8/24/2018 10 comments evening all. i hope you have all had a great summer and that results days have gone smoothly. now the dust has begun to settle after yesterday's chaos, i thought i'd take a few minutes to outline five key things we found out about the new history gcses. ok, it's really four and a question, but hey ho! 1) pupils this year did pretty much the same as last year overall this is not really a surprise as ofqual demanded a statistical tie between 2017 and 2018. therefore almost the same proportion of kids got a g/1 or greater as last year, and the same for c/4 and a/7. there were some minor differences, but at a school cohort level of say 100 pupils, the difference would have been less than a single pupil missing out on a grade c/4. of course, this does not mean everyone’s results will have been stable. it is common with new specifications for some schools to do much better than normal and some to do much worse. this is usually because some schools manage to match what examiners were looking for more closely. it is almost impossible to second guess this precisely in the first year of a specification as examiners refine their expectations during first marking and grading discussions. takeaway lesson: ​ read the examiners’ reports closely and get some papers back if you were not happy with your overall results. 2) your choice of board made almost no difference to overall grades (on average) discounting the statement at the end of the last point: because the boards all had to adhere to this basic rule when awarding grades, the differences between boards are also non-existent. if you look at the detail you will see that some boards did deviate from the 2017 figures, however this is because they have to take prior attainment into account. so, the reason that ocr a seem to have awarded more 4+ and 7+ grades would suggest that more high attaining pupils took these exams. by contrast ocr b probably awarded slightly fewer 4+ and 7+ grades due to a weaker cohort. this might imply that ocr centres chose their specification based on the ability range of their pupils (though this is pure speculation). aqa and edexcel pretty much fit the ofqual model, suggesting they had a broadly representative sample of pupils. read more 10 comments sowing your history curriculum garden: shp 2018 7/19/2018 0 comments hi all. apologies for the delay. i have finally got around to uploading my resources from this year's shp conference. this year i decided to have a long look at curriculum and look at ways we can build powerful curricula as history teachers. i split the presentation into three elements: * a very brief overview of curriculum theory * some considerations about a disciplinary curriculum * examples of a disciplinary curriculum in action access files - shp 2018: sowing new seeds in the folder below you will find the resources shown in the slideshow at the top of the page. if you would like access to previous shp sessions i have run, you will find them here shp 2017: engaging with the contested past ​ a workshop looking at how we can engage students from key stages 3-5 with the world of historical interpretations. shp 2016: visions of america a workshop looking at ways to teach ninteenth century america for gcse students in all exam boards. shp 2015: we have been granted everything a workshop exploring the implications and opportunities created by the removal of national curriculum levels. 0 comments "sluggish and incoherent": 10 elementary tips to help the dfe out with teacher recruitment 1/31/2018 0 comments teacher recruitment is in something of a crisis. for well over three years now, teacher recruitment and retention has been in the headlines, and never more so than this year. the commons public account committee have noted that there is a “growing sense of crisis”, whilst policies to address shortages have been “sluggish and incoherent.” the figures

URL analysis for andallthat.co.uk

http://www.andallthat.co.uk/blog/archives/05-2014
http://www.andallthat.co.uk/subblog/making-good-progress-chapter-3-analysis-and-review
http://www.andallthat.co.uk/blog/archives/05-2016
http://www.andallthat.co.uk/blog/archives/05-2017
http://www.andallthat.co.uk/stand-alone-lessons.html
http://twitter.com/share?url=http://www.andallthat.co.uk/14/post/2018/01/sluggish-and-incoherent-10-tips-to-help-the-dfe-out-with-teacher-recruitment.html
http://www.andallthat.co.uk/blog/archives/02-2015
http://www.andallthat.co.uk/blog/archives/11-2014
http://www.andallthat.co.uk/stand-alone-lessons.html
http://www.andallthat.co.uk/elizabeth-i.html
/www.andallthat.co.uk/blog/tfsi-2016-making-progress-in-history-session-resources
/www.andallthat.co.uk/blog/reading-none-of-the-books-as-a-route-to-loving-reading-freds-story#comments
http://www.andallthat.co.uk/post-modern-world.html
http://www.andallthat.co.uk/blog/category/busk-reading
/www.andallthat.co.uk/blog/post-truth-post-knowledge-the-trump-effect-and-the-history-classroom#comments
history.org.uk
telegraph.co.uk
schoolsweek.co.uk
publications.parliament.uk
behaviourguru.blogspot.co.uk
surveymonkey.co.uk
bbc.co.uk
hoddereducation.co.uk
onedamnthing.org.uk

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Error for "andallthat.co.uk".

the WHOIS query quota for 2600:3c03:0000:0000:f03c:91ff:feae:779d has been exceeded
and will be replenished in 16830 seconds

WHOIS lookup made at 03:06:18 01-Oct-2017

--
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:

Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2017.

You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at http://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REFERRER http://www.nominet.org.uk

  REGISTRAR Nominet UK

SERVERS

  SERVER co.uk.whois-servers.net

  ARGS andallthat.co.uk

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DISCLAIMER
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:
Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2017.
You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at http://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REGISTERED no

DOMAIN

  NAME andallthat.co.uk

NSERVER

  NS22.DOMAINCONTROL.COM 208.109.255.11

  NS21.DOMAINCONTROL.COM 216.69.185.11

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .